Pinned toot

One solution would be to have an option for the Home timeline to only show accounts which are not in a list. Hmm.

Show thread

One problem I have running a Mastodon single-user instance is, that lists are completely unusable. If I add a user to a list but don’t also follow them explicitly, I won’t see their new toots appearing in the list. Or am I misunderstanding something?

Today a novice programmer asked me about dependency management in Python and how he can ship his scripts on windows. Oh boy was my answer long and complicated.

How many weeb accounts must one Fediverse user unfollow to reclaim a sane timeline?

buckket boosted

2020 is already 1% complete, what have you accomplished?

I need to access the pads in the middle of this dev board but I'm not sure how to do it without ruining the board forever...

and so the journey begins to turn these into a full-fledged product for your c64 🦉

buckket boosted

If you can't handle me at my worst … you shouldn’t handle me at all. Because I’m an awful person.

buckket boosted
buckket boosted

#OPSEC pro tip: Hide login suggestions in #Firefox to prevent bystanders from detecting your secret shitposting account names

Add this to your profile/chrome/userChrome.css:

#PopupAutoComplete > richlistbox {
display: none !important;

buckket boosted

TIL: you can interact with a microphone by pointing a laser at it.

Researchers used this to trigger Google Home voice commands from hundreds of meters away.

buckket boosted

Upgraded to Mastodon v3.0.0 and everything seems to work so far. Cool.

buckket boosted

Auf der Vogelseite feiern Leute die (evtl. nur interpretierte) Obdachlosigkeit von RMS infolge seines MIT-Posten-Verlustes; Fanal nach Kübeln aus Hass-&-Entmenschlichungs-Postings gegen ihn dort. Wenn das die woken Bubbles sein sollen, na dann gute Nacht; auf die "Gerechtigkeit" und "bessere Welt" solcher Reflexe kann ich verzichten.

buckket boosted

Reading the FSFE’s statement regarding RMS I’m glad I never supported them financially or otherwise.

buckket boosted

Wenn man ständig erklären muss, was RMS _eigentlich_ meinte, ist das evtl. ein gutes Argument, ihn aus einer Sprachrohr-Position zu lösen. Aber die Hälfte (!= alle) seiner skandalisierten Formulierungen entblößt sich bei nüchterner Lektüre in context als sehr anders denn kolportiert. Zur Epstein-Sache z.B. Das Ausmaß an Fehl-Lektüre erscheint mir teils bizarr; Inversion des Principle of Charity. Was zersetzt die Lese-Fähigkeiten der Leute so: Vorurteil, Emotion zum Thema?

Show more

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!